STATEMENT
BY
MR. ANAND PANYARACHUN
AT THE ASIAN FORUM
ON
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
September 18, 2003 at the
Inter Continental Hotel, Bangkok
I
am honored to address this opening ceremony of the second annual Asian Forum on
Corporate Social Responsibility and welcome all the delegates, presenters and
others to Thailand.
I
am glad that such a significant subject is being discussed here and firmly believe
that there is an ever-increasing necessity for companies, government and civil
societies to give absolute attention to corporate social responsibilities issues.
This
conference is an opportunity for all to discuss and identify the recent developments
and innovations in relation to various aspects of corporate social responsibility.
I would like to emphasise that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is not only
a subject for business and civil society. The government also has a significant
role to play and can motivate and facilitate CSR. The social, economic, political,
environmental problems we are faced with these days are so complicated that an
interaction between the government, business and civil society is a necessity.
Even
though the interpretation of the term ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ continues
to be in a state of evolution, it is encouraging that a large number of governments,
businesses and civil societies around the world have established some basic awareness
and standard expectations towards the society, community and environment they
operate in.
Several factors such as, accountability,
transparency, investor pressure and stakeholder activism have formed the direction
of CSR. Moreover, as guidance to companies and to enhance accountability for corporate
performance on CSR issues, a number of performance and reporting standards have
been produced in the recent years. Some of these are Social Accountability 8000,
UN Global Compact, and the Global Reporting initiative, OECD guidelines for Multinational
Enterprises.
The CSR movement is gaining support
from investors and the business community, and is spreading rapidly in the current
era of the business world.
I am delighted
that today’s business environment, the globalization as well as social pressures,
impacting the principles and perspective of the business activity, has resulted
in adaptation of the CSR culture by various companies around the world.
The
significance of CSR has escalated in the global market place. In recent years
many companies who violated social and environmental standards have been targets
of adverse publicity by human rights, labor rights and environmental organizations.
Such publicity can definitely damage the reputation of an organization, which
is undeniably one of the most valuable assets of any organization.
It
is interesting to observe that CSR is considered imperative for building a sound
and credible image of a company. It is now believed that, in addition to various
other factors, adopting socially and environmentally responsible initiatives enhances
shareholder value, impacts financial performance and ensures continued success
of a company.
In
the new global economy, there is increased pressure from investors, consumers,
and employees to consider social and environmental criteria in corporate business
activities. Consequently the companies are no longer evaluated merely on the basis
of financial performance, but on the financial, social and environmental performance.
This has lead to using a "triple bottom line" or "sustainable"
approach - social, environmental, and financial data for evaluating the performance
of an organization.
I
believe that all of you here today understand what CSR means. As you know that
there are multiple definitions of CSR, I feel that there is a need to consider
and re-define a common definition of CSR on an agreed basis.
In
general terms, CSR is the alignment of business operations with its social and
environmental values. CSR is the voluntary incorporation of social and environmental
values and concerns in the business operations of an organization.
However, we cannot ignore that in this world of transparency, investors
and consumers are aware of and have increasing knowledge of the impact of all
companies’ activities on the society and environment.
In
legal terms a company is created to make money with the sole purpose to increase
shareholders profit. Besides various positives, this arrangement undeniably overlooks
certain detrimental environmental and social effects.
One
commentator, Robert Hinkley*, argues that the law in USA,
in its current form, actually inhibits executives and corporations from being
socially responsible, as the purpose of the corporation is just to make money
for shareholders and that many social ills created by corporations stem directly
from corporate law. Any deviation from that can leave a corporation open to a
lawsuit. Consequently Hinkley suggests adding a phrase on CSR to corporate law
and which would then be read, to some extent, like - Directors and officers
have a duty to make money for shareholders, but not at the expense of the environment,
human rights, the public safety, the communities in which the corporation operates
or the dignity of its employees.
I
would like to share my observation that the General Electric Company is one of
the companies that have moved a step ahead by setting up a Public Responsibility
Committee, consisting of Board members, for reviewing and overseeing the company’s
position on corporate social responsibilities and public issues affecting the
investors and other key stakeholders of the company.
We
also cannot ignore the whole range of corporate responsibility initiatives including
policies, programs and/or reports of the various globally recognized companies
such as, AVIVA (formerly Commercial Union), Exel, Starbucks Coffee Co and McDonald’s.
Companies around the world now voluntarily
report on their environmental and social practices and performances and are candidly
addressing the CSR issues on their websites. Various companies are endeavoring
to release their corporate responsibility report using Global Reporting Initiative
guidelines.
The fundamental advantages
of CSR cannot be overlooked. According to some, CSR is similar to quality management of a company since it is considered
as an investment and not a cost. I think the advantages of CSR initiatives unquestionably
outweigh any costs incurred in relation to such initiatives.
The
CSR initiatives assist in creating an atmosphere of trust in an organization that
results in motivation and commitment of employees. Certain CSR initiatives may
also directly decrease operating costs. For example, efforts to reduce gas emissions
may increase energy efficiency and reduce utility bills.
In
the present global environment, customers, investors and suppliers often support
companies viewed as “socially responsible” thus, escalating market opportunities
for the company.
One
of the key advantages of CSR is that it can assist in better performance of the
companies and generate growth and profits of the company. The shareholder value
is increased as social investment funds target the company. Moreover, effective
CSR policy in a company can also assist in improving risk management and avoiding
lawsuits against a company.
Let me wrap
up now by reiterating a few key points:
Firstly,
we need to appreciate that any company that demonstrates a commitment to its stakeholders
through socially responsible business operations will be considered a good corporate
citizen and will also have a competitive edge over its peers.
Secondly,
Organizations should realize that a good business sense requires concurrent handling
of the needs of their employees and the societies in which they operate.
And,
Thirdly, that Government, civil societies and companies can no longer ignore irresponsible
corporate practices, as CSR is applicable, in equal measures to the governments,
civil society and business.
I
hope you all are, in this meaningful gathering today, ready for the challenge
to participate and expand your understanding and implementation of CSR.
I
wish you all a successful and productive conference.
Thank
you for your attention.
* * * *